Evaluation of the Implementation of Upskilling and Reskilling Training Education in the Culinary Skills Program using the Kirkpatrick Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61667/3redf095Keywords:
Evaluation, Training education, Culinary skill, Krikpatrick modelAbstract
In today's dynamic job market, continuous learning and skill development are crucial for sustaining employment and enhancing career prospects. This study evaluates the implementation of upskilling and reskilling training in a culinary skills program using the Kirkpatrick Model. The Kirkpatrick Model, a widely recognized framework for training evaluation, encompasses four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and results. This research aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the training program's effectiveness and its impact on participants' performance and career progression. The study employs a mixed-method approach, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to gather data from participants who completed the culinary skills program. The first level of the Kirkpatrick Model, reaction, measures participants' satisfaction and engagement with the training. The second level, learning, assesses the knowledge and skills acquired during the program. The third level, behavior, examines the application of learned skills in the workplace. The fourth level, results, evaluates the overall impact of the training on participants' job performance and career advancement. The results of this evaluation indicate that the upskilling and reskilling training program in the culinary skills program was highly effective across all four levels of the Kirkpatrick Model. Participants responded positively to the training, acquired significant new knowledge and skills, applied these skills effectively in their work, and contributed to improved organizational performance.
References
Abdalla, W., Renukappa, S., & Suresh, S. (2022). An evaluation of critical knowledge areas for managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(10), 2634–2667. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2021-0083
Bentley, S., Mudan, G., Strother, C., & Wong, N. (2015). Are live ultrasound models replaceable? traditional versus simulated education module for FAST Exam. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 16(6), 818–822. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.9.27276
Chen, C. H., Wang, C. L., & Chen, P. Y. (2018). Performance evaluation of the Service Industry Innovation Research program: The application of a means-end chain. Technology in Society, 54, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.03.009
Galport, N., & Azzam, T. (2017). Evaluator Training Needs and Competencies: A Gap Analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 38(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214016643183
Gardin, F. A., & Mensch, J. M. (2014). Diagnostic problem solving in male collegiate athletic trainers. Journal of Athletic Training, 49(4), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.04
Goldstrom, I. D., & Manderscheid, R. W. (1983). A descriptive analysis of Community Support Program case managers serving the chronically mentally ill. Community Mental Health Journal, 19(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00778676
Hill, N. S. (2006). Pulmonary rehabilitation. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 3(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.200511-121JH
Hites, L. S., Sass, M. M., D’Ambrosio, L., Brown, L. M., Wendelboe, A. M., Peters, K. E., & Sobelson, R. K. (2014). The Preparedness and Emergency Response Learning Centers: Advancing standardized evaluation of public health preparedness and response trainings. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 20(SUPPL. 5), S17–S23. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000066
Keay, L., Hunter, K., Ralph, M., Porykali, B., Lyford, M., Clapham, K., Lo, W., & Ivers, R. (2018). Overcoming barriers to use of child car seats in an urban Aboriginal community-formative evaluation of a program for Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0351-z
Mahasneh, O. M., Al-Kreimeen, R. A., Alrammana, A. A., & Murad, O. S. (2021). Distance education amid the COVID-19 pandemic from the students’ point of view. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(4), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i4.6229
Nottingham, S., & Henning, J. (2014). Feedback in clinical education, part II: Approved clinical instructor and student perceptions of and influences on feedback. Journal of Athletic Training, 49(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-48.6.15
Okuyama, J., Suzukamo, Y., Osanai, F., Nishizawa, Y., & Izumi, S.-I. (2023). Nurturing Basic Societal Competencies in Speech-Language-Hearing Therapy Training Education: Effects of Coaching Classes. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 75(3), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1159/000529983
Rejman, M., Kwaśna, A., Chrobot, M., Kjendlie, P. L., & Stalmann, R. K. (2020). Perceived versus real swimming skills of adolescents under standard and challenging conditions: Exploring water competencies as an approach to drowning prevention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113826
Sin, J., & Scully, E. (2008). An evaluation of education and implementation of psychosocial interventions within one UK mental healthcare trust: Practice Development. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 15(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01202.x
Smith, B. L., Sward, L. B., & Ellis, S. K. (2020). Telemedicine and Distance Learning for
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Global Synthesis in Education Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.