The Efficacy of Flipped Classroom Models in Improving Student Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis

Authors

  • Noor Azlinda Zainal Abidin Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah Author
  • Benić Mislave Institut za hrvatski jezik, Zagreb, Croatia Author
  • Yalley Abenue Asefuaba Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61667/v180e591

Keywords:

Student Engagement , Academic Achievement , Implementation Quality , Educational Effectiveness

Abstract

The educational landscape continues to evolve in response to shifting student needs and technological advancements. The flipped classroom model has garnered significant attention as a potentially transformative approach to teaching and learning, yet inconsistencies in research findings necessitate a systematic analysis of its effectiveness. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the effectiveness of flipped classroom approaches on student engagement and academic achievement, identify key moderating variables, and develop evidence-based implementation recommendations.

A comprehensive meta-analysis of 172 studies published between 2010-2024 was conducted, employing rigorous inclusion criteria and standardized coding procedures. Random effects models were used to calculate aggregate effect sizes and conduct moderator analyses to examine variables influencing effectiveness. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that flipped classroom approaches demonstrate a medium positive effect on student engagement (g = 0.57) and a small-to-medium effect on academic achievement (g = 0.42). Behavioral engagement (g = 0.63) and cognitive engagement (g = 0.59) showed stronger effects than emotional engagement (g = 0.48). Effectiveness varied by subject domain, with stronger effects in STEM (g = 0.49) and professional disciplines (g = 0.46). An inverse relationship emerged between educational level and effect size, with primary education showing the strongest effects (g = 0.58). Implementation duration (r = 0.42) and quality significantly moderated outcomes, with high-quality implementations demonstrating substantially stronger effects than low-quality implementations. This research resolves inconsistencies in current literature by systematically quantifying effectiveness across contexts and identifying influential moderating variables, providing educational stakeholders with evidence-based implementation guidance. The findings of this meta-analysis indicate that flipped classroom approaches consistently enhance student engagement and achievement across educational contexts. Implementation effectiveness is significantly influenced by educational level, subject domain, implementation duration, and quality. Educational stakeholders should prioritize comprehensive implementation planning and sustained support to maximize effectiveness, particularly in primary and secondary education settings.

References

Agyeman, N. Y. B., & Aphane, V. (2024). Implementing Flipped Classroom to Enhance Student Engagement: An Action Research. E-Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Sciences, 1860–1878. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.202451119

Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2020). A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1017–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09718-8

Annury, M. N., Sutrisno, D., Mariam, S., & ... (2023). The Impact of Reading Strategy Instruction Based on QAR with Visually-Oriented Learners. In PAROLE: Journal of …. eprints.uad.ac.id. https://eprints.uad.ac.id/78463/1/51362-216507-1-PB.pdf

Bormann, J. (2014). Affordances of flipped learning and its effects on student engagement and achievement. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1128&context=grp

Celik, T., Akay, C., & Kanadlı, S. (n.d.). Revisiting flipped class model effectiveness on learning performance: A meta-analysis of meta analyses. Journal on School Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.19.2.20186

Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7

Cuban, L. (1987). Cultures of Teaching: A Puzzle. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X87023004004

Gamo, J. A. (2022). Anatomy Education‐Paradigm Shift from Passive to Active Learning‐Effects on Student Engagement, Comprehension and Retention A Review of Literature from 2012 to 2022. The FASEB Journal, 36(S1). https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.s1.l7949

Jang, H. Y., & Kim, H. J. (2020). A Meta-Analysis of the Cognitive, Affective, and Interpersonal Outcomes of Flipped Classrooms in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 10(4), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI10040115

Jantakoon, T., Jantakun, T., Jantakun, T., Noibuddee, A., Pasmala, R., Wannapiroon, P., & Nilsook, P. (2024). The Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom in English Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis. World Journal of English Language, 15(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n3p50

Jones, K. E. (2010). Introduction to the Special Focus: Experiential Education. Christian Education Journal Research on Educational Ministry, 7(1), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/073989131000700107

Li, S., Fu, W., Liu, X., & Hwang, G.-J. (n.d.). Effectiveness of Flipped Classrooms for K–12 Students: Evidence from a Three-Level Meta-Analysis. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241261732

Lockwood, K., & Esselstein, R. M. (2013). The inverted classroom and the CS curriculum. Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445236

Manlapig, E. F. (2024). Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom Model (FCM) on Students’ Learning Achievement in Physical Science: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 4747–4754. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0624.1572

Mawardi, D. N., Sulistyowati, E., & Hukom, J. (2024). Meta-Analisis investigasi model kelas terbalik pada keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi (HOTS) siswa matematika: Analisis efek gabungan dan heterogenitas. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 10(1), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v10i1.22296

McLaughlin, J. E. (2018). Flipped classrooms, by design. Medical Education, 52(9), 887–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/MEDU.13654

Mera, E. A. R., & Mera, K. D. R. (2024). Flipped Classroom como Elemento Favorecedor para el Desarrollo de la Capacidad de Resolución de Problemas en estudiantes de Educación Infantil. Ciencia Latina, 8(4), 10197–10215. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i4.13165

Pujiriyanto, P., Handaru, C. D., & Hukom, J. (2024). Meta-Analysis of The Effectiveness of The Flipped Classroom Model On Students’ HOTS in Mathematics. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 25(3), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v25i3.45848

Ralević, L., & Tomašević, B. (n.d.). Comparing the Effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom Model and the Traditional Instruction Model: A Meta-Analysis. https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas2103301r

Shahnama, M., Ghonsooly, B., & Shirvan, M. E. (2021). A meta-analysis of relative effectiveness of flipped learning in English as second/foreign language research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1355–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-021-09996-1

Shi, Y., Ma, Y., MacLeod, J., & Yang, H. H. (2020). College students’ cognitive learning outcomes in flipped classroom instruction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00142-8

Sutrisno, D., Abbas, A., & Annury, M. N. (2024). Enhancing Writing Skills through Cultural Integration: Exploring the Impact of Culturally-Responsive Writing Instruction in Diverse EFL Classrooms. Global Synthesis in Education …. https://gse-journal.net/index.php/gse/article/view/47

Sutrisno, D., Martina, M., Karsana, D., Nafi Annury, M., Adri, A., Damayanti, W., Hidayah, A. M. N., & Juliastuty, D. (2024). Semiotic Analysis of Psycholinguistic Strategies in Indonesian President Candidates’ Debates 2024: Unraveling Linguistic Signifiers and Mental Processes in Argumentative Discourse. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(5), 943–976. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.7251

Tormey, R., & Henchy, D. (2008). Re-imagining the traditional lecture: an action research approach to teaching student teachers to ‘do’ philosophy. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802045337

Tutal, Ö., & Yazar, T. (2021). Flipped classroom improves academic achievement, learning retention and attitude towards course: a meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12564-021-09706-9

Veen, B. D. Van. (2013). Flipping Signal-Processing Instruction [SP Education]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 30(6), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2013.2276650

Wagner, M., Gegenfurtner, A., & Urhahne, D. (2024). Effectiveness of Flipped Classrooms. 225–240. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003386131-22

Yair, G. (2000). Educational Battlefields in America: The Tug-of-War over Students’ Engagement with Instruction. Sociology Of Education, 73(4), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673233

Downloads

Published

2024-11-27